Reviews

Vol. 46: Issue 1 - February 2026

Haemangiopericytoma and solitary fibrous tumour of the parotid gland: a scoping review

Authors

Key words: haemangiopericytoma, solitary fibrous tumour, NAB2-STAT6 gene rearrangement, parotid gland, recurrence
Publication Date: 2026-03-09

Abstract

Solitary fibrous tumour/haemangiopericytoma, well-circumscribed in relation to adjacent soft tissue (4×). Ovoid to fusiform spindle cells with indistinct borders, arranged haphazardly or in short, ill-defined fascicles (A,B). Staghorn-like, branching, hyalinised vasculature, hyalinised to collagenous stroma, occasionally with streaming of cells between collagen (10×). Nuclear STAT6 and cytoplasmic CD34 positivity observed (C,D).
Cover figure: Solitary fibrous tumour/haemangiopericytoma, well-circumscribed in relation to adjacent soft tissue (4×). Ovoid to fusiform spindle cells with indistinct borders, arranged haphazardly or in short, ill-defined fascicles (A,B). Staghorn-like, branching, hyalinised vasculature, hyalinised to collagenous stroma, occasionally with streaming of cells between collagen (10×). Nuclear STAT6 and cytoplasmic CD34 positivity observed (C,D).

Salivary gland tumours represent about 3-10% of head and neck tumours, with the parotid gland being the most affected. The World Health Organization classification of these tumours is continually evolving due to their diverse histology and biological behaviour. Haemangiopericytoma (HPC) and solitary fibrous tumour (SFT) have been reclassified as a single entity characterised by NAB2-STAT6 gene rearrangement, typically presenting as slow-growing, painless masses in the parotid region, and immunohistochemistry is essential for diagnosis. This study aims to examine the clinical characteristics of these tumours to better understand their biological behaviour. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we reviewed the literature using the search string (haemangiopericytoma), OR (solitary fibrous tumor) AND (parotid gland). Of the initially collected 201 papers, 49 were selected for detailed analysis, focusing on data from 53 patients, all of whom underwent surgery. Of these patients, 11.3% (n = 6) were diagnosed with malignancy, while 3 more were suspected to have malignancy. Our findings suggest that SFT morphology predominates among lesions, but malignancy is more often associated with features of HPC. Further comprehensive study is needed to gather additional data on their biological behaviour.

Introduction

Salivary gland tumours represent approximately 3-10 % of head and neck tumours, wherein the parotid gland is the most affected, and around 25% of such tumours are malignant 1. Because of their heterogeneous histology and biological behaviour, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of these tumours continues to change. In this context, haemangiopericytoma (HPC) and solitary fibrous tumour (SFT) are rare entities. Despite historically being considered two different entities, the 4th Edition of the WHO classifies them as fibroblastic tumours characterised by haphazardly arranged spindled-to-ovoid cells, with prominent staghorn vasculature and NAB2-STAT6 gene rearrangement 2.

HPC was described for the first time in 1942 3; it originates from the pericytes of Zimmerman surrounding the capillaries and postcapillary venules 4, and can be found in the head and neck region in 15-25% of cases 5.

SFTs are composed of pleomorphic spindle cells, are distributed and patternless, and are situated within variably dense collagenous stroma. The most common sites for these tumours in the head and neck are the sino-nasal tract, orbit, oral cavity, and salivary glands 6.

Tumours with high mitotic count, hypercellularity, necrosis, and atypia (round cell and anaplastic morphology, or nuclear pleomorphism) are considered malignant 7. The NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene is a unique molecular feature of the HPC/SFT family, present in up to 100% of cases 8.

Immunohistochemistry is very important for correct diagnosis. The markers used include CD34, Bcl2, CD99, and vimentin expression in the absence of actin, desmin, S100 protein, and epithelial cells 9. Immunostaining for STAT6 rearrangement is also available in pathology laboratories 10,11.

These tumours typically present as slow-growing, painless masses in the parotid region. Due to their slow growth, symptoms are not always noticeable in the early stages. While they are generally considered benign, there have been instances of malignant behaviour, though there is currently limited knowledge about this type of tumour due to its rarity.

On CT scans, they are both often homogeneous in appearance, although cystic areas, calcifications, myxoid degeneration, or haemorrhage may be present, particularly in large tumours 12. They tend to displace rather than invade surrounding tissues, and enhance after contrast administration. On MRI, HPC/SFT displays low T1 signal intensity and variable T2 signal 13, and enhances intensely after intravenous gadolinium administration 14 despite these characteristics are not pathognomonic for HPC/SFT. While HPC/SFT demonstrate benign behaviour, follow-up is essential to detect any sign of local recurrence early on. A tendency to both local and distant recurrence has been described 15.

Treatment requires surgical removal, with approaches varying depending on location and extent of involvement 16. This study endeavours to explore the clinical characteristics of these tumours to better understand their biologic potential and their transformation into a malignant entity through a review of the literature (Cover figure).

Materials and methods

This review was conducted with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines (Fig. 1)17. The research was carried out using the PubMed and Scopus database with the following research string: [(haemangiopericytoma) OR (solitary fibrous tumor)] AND (parotid gland). Two reviewers (C.L. and E.S.) performed the literature search and the abstract and full text reading. All the articles found were included, without any period of restriction. The last research on the database was performed in April 2024.

The inclusion criteria for first abstract reading selection were:

  • abstracts in English;
  • articles about haemangiopericytoma or solitary fibrous tumour;
  • studies on diseases of the parotid gland.

The exclusion criteria for this phase were:

  • abstract in other languages;
  • articles treating different topics;
  • diseases of other salivary glands.

After the first abstract based selection, a full text reading was performed, using additional criteria.

The inclusion criteria for the second selection phase were:

  • case report or case series as study design;
  • full text available;
  • full text in English;
  • studies on diseases of the parotid gland.

The exclusion criteria were:

  • review;
  • the full text not being available;
  • the full text being in another language;
  • studies on disease of the other salivary glands.

Two-hundred and one papers were selected. In total, 58 duplicated articles were eliminated, resulting in 143 articles being eligible for further analysis. First, an abstract reading selection was made according to the inclusion criteria, in which 68 abstracts were selected. After this, a further exclusion following full-text reading and the pre-established criteria was made, with 49 articles being selected (Fig. 1).

The selected articles were then analysed in detail, extracting data on study design; publication year; age and gender of the patients; imaging and histologic reports of the first parotid disease and its metastasis; the type of treatment and outcomes; potential recurrence and related treatment and follow-up status.

Results

Ten of the 49 articles selected (20%) were published before the year 2000. A total of 53 patients (28 males and 25 females) were reported in the selected papers, and the mean age at diagnosis was 49.3 years (range, 11-82), while four (7.6%) cases were paediatric. In total, 22 patients developed the disease in the right parotid gland, while for 30 patients it developed in the left (for one patient, data were missing). Clinical data of the sample are reported in Table I. All the selected articles are listed in Table II.

Regarding clinical presentation, 48 patients showed swelling in the parotid area, 5 complained of loco-regional pain, and in 2 of 5 cases the mass was situated in the deep lobe 21,25,55,56. Only one patient showed facial nerve impairment at the first medical examination; this patient was a 72-year-old woman with a 5-year history of a slowly enlarging left parotid mass and a diagnosis of malignant solitary fibrous tumour 56. In the paediatric cases, 3 of 4 patients were females, and swelling in the parotid area was seen in each.

With regard to preoperative assessments, 39 (73.5%) patients in total were referred to imaging (25 underwent CT and 14 underwent MRI), while 17 (32%) underwent ultrasound only. From a cytopathology perspective, most of the cases did not report preoperative fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) evaluation and cytologic description. In 5 studies an inconclusive result was indicated, even if repeated in one case.

Of all the subjects, the vast majority – 49 in total – underwent surgery. Specifically, 11 underwent enucleoresection, 14 underwent superficial parotidectomy, 20 had total parotidectomy, and 4 had subtotal parotidectomy. A transnasal/transoral surgical approach was taken in one patient 4. However, treatment data were not disclosed for 3 cases of HPC 25,56.

Only one patient received primary chemotherapy (CHT) and subsequent surgery 21. After failure of CHT, a stylohamular approach was taken and a suprahyoid neck dissection was performed.

The histological diagnosis was HPC (30.2%) for 16 patients, 4 of whom (25%) had malignancy, while SFT was diagnosed in 37 patients (69.8%), of which 2 (5%) had malignancy; overall, the total number of malignant cases was 6 (11.3%). In 2 cases, tumours with the histological characteristic of “aggressivity in nature” 4,18 were described, and in one, undifferentiated spindle cells were reported 28. These 3 subjects each underwent RT and were diagnosed with HPC. Including these, the overall malignancy rate was 16.9%, and 43% (7/16) in HPC cases. All relevant histological markers are detailed in Table II.

Concerning malignant cases, one patient was disease-free for nearly 5 years after surgery. She subsequently developed pulmonary and hepatic metastases, which were surgically removed 36. The second patient with malignancy 21 died due to distant metastases, with no specification regarding the location or time of onset. In the third case, the tumour showed two different behaviours under microscopy: a histologically benign area of haemangiopericytoma was present and separated by a clear-cut border from a second area, in which the structure was that of a histologically malignant haemangiopericytoma. The patient developed fatal metastasis 20.

The fourth concerns a patient with a diagnosis of malignant HPC who died with recurrence of the disease after surgery 19, although distant metastases were not mentioned. In the recent fifth case, a young adult with a malignant SFT underwent surgery and RT with no signs of recurrence or distant metastasis at 11 months 63. The final case 56 relates to a case of malignant SFT, in which distant metastases were not mentioned during follow-up. Four patients (7.5%) had postoperative RT 18,63,28, and one underwent both CHT and RT 4.

Six patients (11.3%) had loco-regional recurrence of disease, while only one was malignant. In total, 4 of 53 patients (7.5%) developed distant metastasis, while 3 of 6 malignant cases (50%) and one uncertain case with peculiar characteristics presented metastasis at follow-up 18. The most common site of metastasis was the lungs, although other sites included the pleura, pelvis, muscles, body of vertebrae, retroperitoneum, and liver, with details shown in Table III.

The mean follow-up of the patients was 24.1 months, although in 12 (22%) cases this information was not available.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this article presents the first systematic review of HPC/SFT within the parotid gland. The epidemiological characteristics confirmed by this review show a median age of incidence of 49.3 years, ranging from 11 to 82 years, and a male-to-female ratio of 28 to 25. However, the tumour incidence in the juvenile population and in females was not as low as expected. Indeed, it has been reported that around 5% of salivary gland tumours occur in patients under 18 years 66 of age, although this review shows a higher percentage, namely 7.6% of paediatric cases.

Concerning clinical features, the vast majority of cases herein presented a slow-growing mass in the parotid region. Grossly, these tumours were mostly well circumscribed, with a fibrous pseudocapsule and a cut surface ranging from firm and white to tan and fleshy for cellular variants. Histological analysis usually revealed a patternless distribution of ovoid- and spindle-shaped cells within a variably dense collagenous stroma for SFT morphology, or a branching and dilated staghorn-like vascular network for HPC.

STAT6 and CD34 have proven to be very useful markers. Before the advent of immunohistochemistry, diagnosis relied solely on microscopic analyses without the use of molecular markers.

The precise definition of malignant HPC/SFT remains undetermined. However, certain characteristics such as a high mitotic index, substantial tumour size, increased cellularity, the presence of immature tumour cells, and the occurrence of haemorrhagic or necrotic areas are indicative of a malignant nature of the lesion 5. While tumour characteristics included hyperchromatism and bone destruction, the set of histological data obtained from this review showed that the primary characteristic used for diagnosing malignant tumour was an increased number of mitoses.

The case series results collected herein suggest that SFT and HPC have different biological behaviour. In fact, SFT morphology represented the majority of lesions, but malignancy was mainly related to the HPC pattern, especially when taking into account the 3 cases of highly suspected malignancy. Moreover, one such case was paediatric. In other studies, it has been reported that childhood parotid neoplasms differ from those in adults, being primarily malignant but often presenting at lower grades 67,68.

As expected, surgical approaches tailored to each patient have been the treatment of choice, from superficial parotidectomy to extension to the parapharyngeal space 27. The extent of surgery should be determined by the size and location of the pathology and the structures it affects. Recurrence may occur due to incomplete resection, tumour seeding, within the near tissue, or distant haematogenous spread 16.

We found the recurrence rate to be higher than expected; of 53 patients, recurrence was recorded in 11.3%, and treatment options included surgery, RT, or a combined approach. Local recurrence was observed in most cases in SFT, and the mean time of onset was 24.2 months.

Künzel et al. 49 reported a case of SFT located in the left parotid gland which was removed with no clear margins, carried out in consideration of the tumour’s proximity to the carotid artery; the tumour relapsed after one year. Another case of recurrence was described by Chintale et al. 4 in which a large parotid HPC invading the right maxillary and masticator space relapsed locally after excision and was treated using RT and CHT. The recurrence rate appears to be correlated with tumour dimension, and most importantly the feasibility of achieving clear surgical margins.

Distant metastases were described in 4 cases and were linked to a malignant HPC histology, with the most common site being the lungs. Metastases had a mean time of onset of 31.2 months and were approached with surgery in one case and CHT in another, while for the other patients the chosen treatment was not disclosed. Currently, there are no strict guidelines for adjuvant treatment such as RT. The decision for adjuvant treatment depends on individual patient factors, mainly histological results, and clinical behaviour.

Follow-up is essential to detect any signs of malignancy or local recurrence early on, according to a multidisciplinary approach involving surgeons, oncologists, radiation oncologists, and pathologists. Due to the peculiar characteristics of HPC/SFT a tailored, multidisciplinary follow-up would be recommended in all cases and the role of pathologists appears important. Routine follow-up scans are generally not performed after surgery for benign tumours unless there are specific indications such as tumour rupture during surgery, spillage of cells into the parotid bed, or inability to achieve clear surgical margins. In these circumstances, MRI with gadolinium is preferred.

The scarcity of large case series and multicentric studies on these pathological entities has resulted in diverse treatment protocols and varying approaches in the management of patients with these tumours. The absence of comprehensive data impedes the development of standardised guidelines for their management, similar to other rare lesions in the head and neck region 69. Indeed, advances in immunohistochemistry and molecular discoveries have significantly improved our understanding of tumour classification and subtyping. The reclassification of HPC/SFT based on these new findings has likely led to more accurate diagnosis and identification of these tumours. However, due to the retrospective nature of some studies and a lack of comprehensive data, it is difficult to determine the number of misdiagnosed cases before the reclassification was made. The true incidence of HPC/SFT is underestimated due to the absence of immunohistochemistry and the inability to use molecular markers, especially in historical cases.

Conclusions

HPC/SFT is a mesenchymal tumour that rarely affects the head and neck region. This entity demonstrated different biological behaviour, as SFT represented the majority of lesions but malignancy was mainly related to HPC, especially considering the cases in which malignancy was strongly suspected. Surgery is the treatment of choice. When achieving optimal complete surgical excision, the risk of recurrence for SFT/HPC is relatively low. Regular follow-up is recommended in all cases due to the unpredictable behaviour of these neoplasms, where benign and malignant areas can coexist. When malignant behaviour is demonstrated, the risk of metastasis is high. Further comprehensive studies, particularly concerning histological and immunohistochemical characterisation, are essential to gather additional data and obtain more reliable and consistent results.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author contributions

DM, LS, AE: conceived and designed the analysis; ES,CL: collected the data; AV, SP, RN: contributed data or analysis tools; SP, AE VPF: performed the analysis; CL, VC, GA: wrote the paper; SP, AV, RN: revised the paper; LS, DM, AE, SP: completed the final revision and approval of the draft.

Ethical consideration

Not applicable.

History

Received: April 23, 2025

Accepted: July 1, 2025

Figures and tables

Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram of the literature selection process.

Clinical presentation Swelling in parotid region n = 48 (90.6%)
Pain n = 5 (9.4%)
Paraesthesia n = 1 (1.9%)
Facial nerve impairment n = 1 (1.9%)
Mean age 49.3 y (11-82)
Gender 28 M (52.8%)
25 F (47.2%)
Surgery Enucleoresection n = 11 (20.7%)
Superficial parotidectomy n = 14 (26.4%)
Total parotidectomy n = 20 (37.7%)
Subtotal parotidectomy n = 4 (7.5%)
Transnasal-transoral approach n = 1 (1.9%)
No data available n = 3 (5.6%)
Table I. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the sample (n = 53) sample.
Authors Year Cases Gender Age Treatment of parotid disease Histology Marker (+) Marker (-) Adjuvant treatment Recurence Metastasis Follow-up time, months/status
Neal et al. 18 1973 1 M 21 TP HPC malignant? NA NA RT yes 48/DOD
Katz 19 1975 1 F 69 ER Malignant HPC NA NA yes 168/DOD
Massarelli et al. 20 1980 1 M 64 TP Malignant HPC NA NA yes 16/DOD
Katsantonis et al. 21 1989 1 M 22 CT Malignant HPC NA NA yes 18/DOD
Carrillo et al. 22 1992 3 F 79 TP HPC NA NA 18/AND
F 38 SP HPC 18/AND
M 27 SP HPC 5/AND
Lee et al. 23 1992 1 M 14 SP HPC NA NA 24/AND
Whittam et al. 24 1993 1 F 82 ER HPC NA S100, epithelial markers 12/AND
Hanau et al. 25 1994 1 F 73 NA SFT VIM, CD34 CK, CD31 NA
Ferreiro et al. 26 1996 2 M 46 SP SFT VIM, CD34 - 1/AND
F 78 SP SFT 12/AND
Sato et al. 27 1998 1 M 52 TP SFT VIM, CD34 Desmin, S100, SMA 12/AND
Mortelé et al. 65 2000 1 M 26 TP HPC NA NA NA
Sawh et al. 28 2000 1 F 65 STP Undifferentiated spindle-cell neoplasm HPC VIM, CD34 SMA, desmin, S100, CK RT 24/AND
Mohammed et al. 29 2001 1 F 42 ER SFT VIM, CD34 CAM 5.2, AE1/AE3, EMA, S100, GFAP, SMA 3/AND
Kumagai et al. 30 2002 1 F 47 TP SFT VIM, CD34, bcl-2 SMA, S100, CK, collagen type IV, CD117 14/AND
Sikes et al. 31 2003 1 M 62 TP HPC NA NA 72/AND
Thompson et al. 32 2004 1 F 11 TP SFT CD34, bcl-2 S100, desmin, EMA, SMA 24/AND
Gerhard et al. 33 2004 1 F 34 SP SFT VIM, CD34 Actin, SMA, S100 24/AND
Wiriosuparto et al. 34 2005 1 M 42 TP SFT CD34, bcl-2, CD99 AE1/AE3, CAM5.2, S100, calponin, p63 NA NA
Sreetharan et al. 35 2005 1 M 44 TP SFT NA NA NA
Balaji et al. 36 2008 1 F 56 TP Malignant HPC VIM, actin, CD34 S100, GFAP yes 60/AWD
Cho et al. 37 2008 1 M 58 TP SFT CD34, bcl-2, CD99 S100, SMA, CK 67/AND
Manglik et al. 38 2008 1 M 79 SP SFT CD34, bcl-2, VIM SMA, S100 and EMA 3/AND
Bauer et al. 39 2011 1 M 66 SP SFT CD34, bcl-2, VIM, CD99 CD68, S100, CK, EMA, CAM5.2, SMA, actin, desmin, MYOD1, myogenin, CD117, GFAP, CD31, p63, p53, CD56, NFP, ALK-1 9/AND
Nowlin et al. 40 2011 1 F 28 SP HPC CD34, FLI-1, CD68 Desmin, SMA, S100, CK 18/AND
Iyengar et al. 41 2011 1 M 49 TP SFT VIM, CD34, CD99 Desmin, S100, CD117, CK NA NA
Cristofaro et al. 42 2012 1 M 38 ER SFT CD34, CD99, bcl-2, and VIM CK, S100, SMA 60/AND
Chen et al. 43 2013 1 M 33 TP HPC CD34, CD99, bcl-2,VIM CK, EMA, HMB45, S100, CD117, p63 12/AND
Sousa et al. 44 2013 1 M 32 SP SFT CD34, CD99 and bcl-2 CAM5.2, SMA and S100 10/AND
Apuhan et al. 45 2013 1 M 51 ER SFT CD34 and bcl-2, CD99 S100, Melan-A NA
Liu et al. 46 2014 1 M 55 ER SFT CD34, VIM, CD99, bcl-2 S100, CK, SMA 10/AND
Chis et al. 47 2014 1 F 67 TP SFT VIM, CD34, bcl-2 S100, SMA, GFAP NA/AND
Alonso-Rodriguez et al. 48 2014 1 F 73 ER SFT CD34, CD99, bcl-2 AE/1, AE/2, EMA, S100 Yes 9/AND
Künzel et al. 49 2015 1 F 46 STP SFT CD34, CD99, VIM, bcl-2 CK, S100 Yes 19/AND
Yu et al. 50 2015 1 M 53 SP SFT CD34, CD99, and bcl-2 Pan-CK, EMA, SMA, desmin, S100, CD31, p63, ALK-1 24/AND
Gervasio et al. 51 2017 1 M 54 SP SFT CD34, CD99, bcl-2 NA 24/AND
Rais et al. 52 2017 1 M 42 TP SFT CD34, STAT6 CK, SMA, S100, CD31 11/AND
Ralli et al. 53 2018 1 F 14 ER SFT VIM, CD34, bcl-2, and CD99 S100, desmin, SMA, myogenin NA/AND
Lim et al. 54 2019 1 M 51 STP SFT CD34, bcl-2, CD99, STAT6 CK (AE1-3), CK14, SMA, CD21, CD35 3/AND
Chintale et al. 4 2020 1 F 14 Transnasal and transoral approach HPC “Agressive in nature” NA NA CHT-RT Yes NA/AND
Romano et al. 55 2020 1 M 50 ER SFT CD34, bcl-2, STAT-6, CD99 Actin, desmin, CK CAM NA
Velez Torres et al. 56 2021 2 M 57 NA SFT CD34 Desmin, keratin, EMA, and p63 NA
F 72 NA Malignant SFT NA
Vitale et al. 57 2021 1 F 66 TP SFT CD34, VIM, EMA, bcl-2, CD99 CK, S100, HMB45, desmin, actin, CD117, CD31 NA
Li et al. 58 2021 1 M 40 ER SFT VIM, CD34, STAT6 CD31, desmin, S100 Yes NA
Abdulhaleem et al. 59 2022 1 F 48 TP SFT CD34, CD99, bcl-2, STAT6 CK AE1/AE3, EMA, S100, CD21, CD23, SMA, CD31 12/AND
Goker et al. 60 2022 1 F 80 ER SFT STAT6, CD34, CD99, bcl-2 SMA, desmin, CK AE1/AE3 and ALK1 7/AND
Boschetti et al. 61 2022 1 M 52 SP SFT STAT6, bcl-2, CD99 SMA, calponin, CD34, CD31, ERG, p63, GFAP, S100, CK AE1/AE3, CK7 6/AND
De Ravin et al. 62 2022 1 F 81 TP SFT CD34, CD99, ALDH1, bcl-2, CD99 STAT6, S100, desmin NA
Lee et al. 63 2022 1 F 33 SP Malignant SFT CD34, STAT-6, FLI-1 Pan-CK, CAM5.2, p63, S100, CD31, SMA, calponin RT 11/AND
Muñoz Guerra et al. 64 2022 1 F 37 TP SFT CD34, bcl-2 S100, CK 12/AND
SFT: solitary fibrous tumour; HPC: haemangiopericytoma; TP: total parotidectomy; SP: superficial parotidectomy; ER: enucleoresection; STP: subtotal parotidectomy; NA: not available; DOD: dead of disease; AND: alive and without disease; AWD: alive with disease.
Table II. Clinical data about the cases included in this review.
Time (mean) Sites Histology
Metastasis (3/6 = 50%) 31.2 months Lungs (3) muscles (1), liver (1), vertebrae (1), pelvis (1), retroperitoneal carcinomatosis (1) Malignant HPC (3 + 1 uncertain case)
Recurrence (6/53 = 11.3%) 24.2 months Local recurrence SFT (4)
Malignant HPC (1)
HPC (1)
Table III. Details about recurrence and metastasis.

References

  1. Faur A, Buzaş R, Lăzărescu A. Current developments in diagnosis of salivary gland tumors: from structure to artificial intelligence. Life (Basel). 2024;14. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/life14060727
  2. Fletcher C. 2013. WHO Classification of Tumours. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013.
  3. Stout A, Murray M. Hemangiopericytoma: a vascular tumor featuring Zimmermann’s pericytes. Ann Surg. 1942;116:26-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-194207000-00004
  4. Chintale S, Katre M, Kirdak V. Hemangiopericytoma an incidental parotid swelling: a rare case report. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;74:2417-2421. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-02204-1
  5. Batsakis J, Rice D. The pathology of head and neck tumors: vasoformative tumors, part 9A. Head Neck Surg. 1981;3:231-239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2890030311
  6. Smith S, Gooding W, Elkins M. Solitary fibrous tumors of the head and neck: a multi-institutional clinicopathologic study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:1642-1656. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000940
  7. Mosquera J, Fletcher C. Expanding the spectrum of malignant progression in solitary fibrous tumors: a study of 8 cases with a discrete anaplastic component – Is this dedifferentiated SFT?. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:1314-1321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0b013e3181a6cd33
  8. Robinson D, Wu Y, Kalyana-Sundaram S. Identification of recurrent NAB2-STAT6 gene fusions in solitary fibrous tumor by integrative sequencing. Nat Genet. 2013;45:180-185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2509
  9. de Perrot M, Fischer S, Bründler M. Solitary fibrous tumors of the pleura. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:285-293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03374-4
  10. Yoshida A, Tsuta K, Ohno M. STAT6 immunohistochemistry is helpful in the diagnosis of solitary fibrous tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:552-559. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000137
  11. Doyle L, Vivero M, Fletcher C. Nuclear expression of STAT6 distinguishes solitary fibrous tumor from histologic mimics. Mod Pathol. 2014;27:390-395. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2013.164
  12. Ganly I, Patel S, Stambuk H. Solitary fibrous tumors of the head and neck: a clinicopathologic and radiologic review. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;132:517-525. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.132.5.517
  13. Norton S, Clark S, Sheehan A. Solitary fibrous tumour of the diaphragm. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1997;38:685-686.
  14. Chick J, Chauhan N, Madan R. Solitary fibrous tumors of the thorax: nomenclature, epidemiology, radiologic and pathologic findings, differential diagnoses, and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:W238-W248. doi:https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.8430
  15. Wang K, Mei F, Wu S. Hemangiopericytoma: incidence, treatment, and prognosis analysis based on SEER database. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2468320
  16. Baldi G, Stacchiotti S, Mauro V. Solitary fibrous tumor of all sites: outcome of late recurrences in 14 patients. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2013;3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-3329-3-4
  17. Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  18. Neal T, Starke W. Hemangiopericytoma of the parotid gland: a case report with autopsy. Laryngoscope. 1973;83:1953-1958. doi:https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-197312000-00006
  19. Katz A. Unusual lesions of the parotid gland. J Surg Oncol. 1975;7:219-235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.2930070308
  20. Massarelli G, Tanda F, Fois V. Haemangiopericytoma of the parotid gland. Report of a case and review of the literature. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1980;386:81-89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00432646
  21. Katsantonis G, Friedman W, Rosenblum B. The surgical management of advanced malignancies of the parotid gland. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;101:633-640. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/019459988910100604
  22. Carrillo R, Rodriquez-Peralto J, Batsakis J. Primary haemangiopericytomas of the parotid gland. J Laryngol Otol. 1992;106:659-661. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100120468
  23. Lee G, Wong D, Chang R. Hemangiopericytoma of the parotid gland: report of case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:1329-1332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90238-u
  24. Whittam D, Hellier W. Haemangiopericytoma of the parotid salivary gland: report of a case with literature review. J Laryngol Otol. 1993;107:1159-1162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100125551
  25. Hanau C, Miettinen M. Solitary fibrous tumor: histological and immunohistochemical spectrum of benign and malignant variants presenting at different sites. Hum Pathol. 1995;26:440-449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0046-8177(95)90147-7
  26. Ferreiro J, Nascimento A. Solitary fibrous tumour of the major salivary glands. Histopathology. 1996;28:261-264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2559.1996.d01-419.x
  27. Sato J, Asakura K, Yokoyama Y. Solitary fibrous tumor of the parotid gland extending to the parapharyngeal space. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;255:18-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s004050050015
  28. Sawh R, Lele S, Borkowski J. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of hemangiopericytoma: report of two cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 2000;23:187-191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0339(200009)23:3<187::aid-dc9>3.0.co;2-y
  29. Mohammed K, Harbourne G, Walsh M. Solitary fibrous tumour of the parotid gland. J Laryngol Otol. 2001;115:831-832. doi:https://doi.org/10.1258/0022215011909099
  30. Kumagai M, Suzuki H, Takahashi E. A case of solitary fibrous tumor of the parotid gland: review of the literature. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2002;198:41-46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.198.41
  31. Sikes J, Ghali G, Veillon D. Parotid mass in a 62-year-old man. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:1073-1077. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00320-3
  32. Thompson M, Cheng L, Stewart J. A paediatric case of a solitary fibrous tumour of the parotid gland. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004;68:481-487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2003.10.023
  33. Gerhard R, Fregnani E, Falzoni R. Cytologic features of solitary fibrous tumor of the parotid gland. A case report. Acta Cytol. 2004;48:402-406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000326393
  34. Wiriosuparto S, Krassilnik N, Bhuta S. Solitary fibrous tumor: report of a case with an unusual presentation as a spindle cell parotid neoplasm. Acta Cytol. 2005;49:309-313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000326154
  35. Sreetharan S, Prepageran N. Benign fibrous tumour of the parotid gland. Asian J Surg. 2005;28:45-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60258-X
  36. Balaji R, Khoo J, Sittampalam K. CT imaging of malignant metastatic hemangiopericytoma of the parotid gland with histopathological correlation. Cancer Imaging. 2008;8:186-190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0030
  37. Cho K, Ro J, Choi J. Mesenchymal neoplasms of the major salivary glands: clinicopathological features of 18 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265:S47-S56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0488-5
  38. Manglik N, Patil S, Reed M. Solitary fibrous tumour of the parotid gland. Pathology. 2008;40:89-91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313020701716334
  39. Bauer J, Miklos A, Thompson L. Parotid gland solitary fibrous tumor: a case report and clinicopathologic review of 22 cases from the literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2012;6:21-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-011-0305-8
  40. Nowlin R, Kokot N. Hemangiopericytoma of the parotid: a case report. Laryngoscope. 2011;121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.22016
  41. Iyengar J, Atmaram M, Neeli D. Solitary fibrous tumor presenting as a mass in the parotid gland. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2011;54:612-613. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/0377-4929.85114
  42. Cristofaro M, Allegra E, Giudice M. Two new localizations of solitary fibrous tumor in the italian population: parotid gland and oral cavity-review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:2360-2367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.10.023
  43. Chen D, Xuan J, Sun M. Lipomatous hemangiopericytoma (adipocytic variant of solitary fibrous tumor) of the parotid gland: a case report and review of the literature. Oncol Lett. 2013;6:1380-1382. doi:https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1538
  44. Sousa A, Souto G, Sousa I. Solitary fibrous tumor of the parotid gland: case report. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013;5:E208-E211. doi:https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.51103
  45. Apuhan T, Iwenofu H, Özer E. Solitary fibrous tumor of the accessory parotid gland: a unique case. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2013;23:239-241. doi:https://doi.org/10.5606/kbbihtisas.2013.42714
  46. Liu Y, Li K, Shi H. Solitary fibrous tumours in the extracranial head and neck region: correlation of CT and MR features with pathologic findings. Radiol Med. 2014;119:910-919. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0409-9
  47. Chis O, Albu S. Giant solitary fibrous tumor of the parotid gland. Case Rep Med. 2014;2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/950712
  48. Alonso-Rodríguez E, González-Otero T, Castro-Calvo A. Parotid gland solitary fibrous tumor with mandibular bone destruction and aggressive behavior. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014;6:E299-E302. doi:https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.51256
  49. Künzel J, Hainz M, Ziebart T. Head and neck solitary fibrous tumors: a rare and challenging entity. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273:1589-1598. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3670-1
  50. Yu R, Rebello R. Solitary fibrous tumor of the parotid gland: a case report. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;27:401-405.
  51. Gervasio C, Cerutti M, Dalmasso G. A rare case of solitary fibrous tumor of parotid gland: diagnostic work-up and treatment. Otorinolaringologia. 2017;67:116-119. doi:https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-6621.17.02129-4
  52. Rais M, Kessab A, Sayad Z. Solitary fibrous tumor occurring in the parotid gland: a case report. BMC Clin Pathol. 2017;17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12907-017-0062-z
  53. Ralli M, Marwah N, Agarwal M. Solitary fibrous tumor of the parotid gland in a young female: a rare case report and review of the literature. MEJC. 2018;9:65-69. doi:https://doi.org/10.30476/mejc.2018.42094
  54. Lim D, Tan T, Tan J. Solitary fibrous tumour of the parotid gland: a case report and a 15-year literature review. AME Case Rep. 2019;3. doi:https://doi.org/10.21037/acr.2019.04.05
  55. Romano N, Ferrari A, Moroni M. Solitary fibrous tumor of the deep parotid gland. Ear Nose Throat J. 2022;101:NP291-NP293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561320966068
  56. Velez Torres J, Duarte E, Diaz-Perez J. Mesenchymal neoplasms of salivary glands: a clinicopathologic study of 68 cases. Head Neck Pathol. 2022;16:353-365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-021-01360-2
  57. Vitale A, Paolella C, Rossi G. Recurrent fibrous solitary tumor of the parotid gland with satellite location: imaging, clinical and histological findings of rare entity. Radiol Case Rep. 2021;16:2924-2928. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2021.07.007
  58. Li Y, Li C, Liu Z. Dumbbell-shaped solitary fibrous tumor in the parapharyngeal space: a case report. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9:1204-1209. doi:https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i5.1204
  59. Abdulhaleem K, Dababo M, Othman E. Parotid gland solitary fibrous tumor presenting as a long duration mass: a case report. Case Rep Pathol. 2022;2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2097634
  60. Goker F, Mazzucato C, Maggioni M. Solitary fibrous tumor of parotid gland: a case report and short review of literature. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26:45-50. doi:https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202212_30794
  61. Boschetti C, Vitagliano R, Imola G. Solitary extrapleural fibrous tumor in salivary glands: our experience-case series and literature review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112688
  62. De Ravin E, Marrero Berrios J, Rajasekaran K. Parotid mass in an 81-year-old woman. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;148:981-982. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2022.2249
  63. Lee C, Liu K, Huang S. A dedifferentiated solitary fibrous tumor of the parotid gland: a case report with cytopathologic findings and review of the literature. Diagn Pathol. 2019;14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-019-0792-6
  64. Guerra M, Amat C, Campo F. Solitary fibrous tumor of the parotid gland: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94:78-82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.121990
  65. Mortelé B, Lemmerling M, Seynaeve P. Hemangiopericytoma of the parotid gland: CT and MR features. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1073-1075. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300000463
  66. Lee D, Yoon T, Lee J. Clinical features of pediatric parotid tumors: 10-year experience of a single institute. Acta Otolaryngol. 2013;133:1213-1218. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2013.822554
  67. Zamani M, Grønhøj C, Schmidt Jensen J. Survival and characteristics of pediatric salivary gland cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019;66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.27543
  68. Younes A, Taher M, Sidhom I. Parotid gland masses: outcomes in the pediatric age group. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2023;35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43046-023-00161-8
  69. Liberale C, Rozell-Shannon L, Moneghini L. Stop calling me cavernous hemangioma! A literature review on misdiagnosed bony vascular anomalies. J Invest Surg. 2022;35:141-150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2020.1824041

Downloads

Authors

Daniele Monzani - Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Department, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Carlotta Liberale - Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Department, University of Verona, Verona, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4285-6862

Erika Segato - Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Department, University of Verona, Verona, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7616-1180

Valerio Arietti - Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Department, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. Corresponding author - valerio.arietti@gmail.com

Valeria Caragli - Otolaryngology and Audiology Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7112-0282

Luca Sacchetto - Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Department, University of Verona, Verona, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3880-4998

Riccardo Nocini - Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Department, University of Verona, Verona, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7616-1180

Viscardo Paolo Fabbri - Department of Laboratory Medicine and Surgical Anatomy, Pathology Unit, AOU Policlinico Modena, Italy

Giovanna Attolini - Department of Laboratory Medicine and Surgical Anatomy, Pathology Unit, AOU Policlinico Modena, Italy

Albino Eccher - Department of Laboratory Medicine and Surgical Anatomy, Pathology Unit, AOU Policlinico Modena, Italy; Section of Pathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy

Silvia Palma - Department Audiology Primary Care, Ausl, Modena, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5521-4343

How to Cite
Monzani, D., Liberale, C., Segato, E., Arietti, V., Caragli, V., Sacchetto, L., Nocini, R., Fabbri, V. P. ., Attolini, G. ., Eccher, A., & Palma, S. . (2026). Haemangiopericytoma and solitary fibrous tumour of the parotid gland: a scoping review. ACTA Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 46(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-A1253
  • Abstract viewed - 229 times
  • PDF downloaded - 61 times