We assessed the long-term outcomes of alternating chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) using 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) in 25 patients with
stage II or advanced nasopharyngeal cancer treated at our institution between April 1999 and April 2010. Median follow-up duration was
87 months (range 2-189). According to the 2009 TNM classification (UICC), six patients were in stage II, nine in stage III, and 10 in stage
IV. Treatment completion, response and five-year survival rates were retrospectively assessed. ACRT was performed with a first course of
chemotherapy administered followed by the initial round of radiotherapy (36 Gy). Then, a second course of chemotherapy with additional
radiotherapy (20–30 Gy) was administered, followed by a final third course of chemotherapy. For chemotherapy, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU,
800 mg/m2/24 h) was intravenously administered for five days, and cisplatin (CDDP, 50 mg/m2/24 h) was administered on the last two
days. Treatment completion rate was 96% (24 of 25 cases), and the response rate was 100% (CR: 24 cases and PR: 1 case). Additionally,
the five-year overall survival rate was 89.3%. We have demonstrated that ACRT is an effective regimen to treat nasopharyngeal cancer,
revealing higher treatment completion, response, and five-year overall survival rates compared with other combinatorial radiotherapy and
chemotherapy treatment regimens.


Almost all nasopharyngeal cancers are poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinomas or undifferentiated carcinoma and are more sensitive to radiotherapy compared with other head and neck cancers. Surgical treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer is difficult, and thus, various combination therapies of chemotherapy and radiotherapy are more viable management options. Specifically, adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with radiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy and alternating chemoradiotherapy have been shown to improve survival outcomes of nasopharyngeal cancer patients 1-7. Since April 1999, our hospital has performed alternating chemoradiotherapy based on Fuwa’s regimen 1 for stage II or higher nasopharyngeal cancer patients. In this study, we highlight the efficacy of alternating chemoradiotherapy in these patients focusing on the following outcomes: (1) treatment completion rates, (2) response rates, and (3) five-year survival rates.

Materials and methods

Patient criteria

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee of the Fukushima Medical University (Fukushima, Japan). Patients with untreated nasopharyngeal cancer who met the following criteria were enrolled in this study: (1) diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma, or undifferentiated carcinoma; (2) exhibited stage II or advanced nasopharyngeal cancer; (3) free of any organ abnormalities (renal function: creatinine clearance > 60 mL/min); and (4) provided written, informed consent.

There were no patients excluded from criteria above between April 1999 and April 2010 at Fukushima Medical University Hospital.


We examined 25 patients histologically confirmed as having stage II, III, or IV type nasopharyngeal cancer.These patients underwent ACRT between April 1999 and April 2010 at Fukushima Medical University Hospital and were included in this retrospective analysis. According to the 2009 TNM staging classification system, cancer stages of the patients were as follows: stage IIA (n = 2); stage IIB (n = 4); stage III (n = 9); stage IVA (n = 5); and stage IVB (n = 5). Patient characteristics are described in Table I. Nineteen patients were male, and six patients were female. The mean age was 46 years (range: 12-71 years) at the time of diagnosis of the primary tumour. The median observation period was 87 months (range: 2-189 months). Progression-free survival and OS rates were analysed with the Kaplan-Meier method. The time to event was calculated from the beginning of the treatment.

ACRT regimen

During ACRT, the first course of chemotherapy with FP was performed before the initial round of radiotherapy. One course of initial chemotherapy consisted of continuous intravenous administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at a dose of 800 mg/m2/24 h for five days (days 1-5) and cisplatin (CDDP) at a dose of 50 mg/m2/24 h for two days (days 6-7). The drip infusion of fluid replacement was established at 4 L/day during CDDP administration. A minimum urine volume of 2 L/day was maintained for five days after CDDP administration. Steroids, palonosetron and aprepitant were used as antiemetics against CDDP. The second and third course of chemotherapies were performed 2-3 days after completion of the initial and additional rounds of radiotherapy (described below). Our regimen is described in Figure 1. When serum creatinine levels were above 1.5 mg/dL on the scheduled date of chemotherapy, chemotherapy was not performed. In addition, when a WBC count below 3,000/mm2 or a platelet count below 75,000/ mm2 was obtained, chemotherapy was postponed, and radiotherapy was performed instead.

The initial radiation therapy was performed five times a week at an irradiation dosage of 1.8-2 Gy using a linear accelerator (6 mV photons) 4-5 days after completing chemotherapy. A 3D conformal shrinking field was used, and the radiation technique was provided along with the duration of the total course of treatments. A total 36 Gy was administered into the base of the skull and supraclavicular fossa. Additional radiation (20-30 Gy) was administered to a smaller area a week after the second course of chemotherapy.

Progression of the primary lesion in the nasopharynx was evaluated using CT, MRI and fibre-optic pharyngeal endoscopy. Metastasis to cervical lymph nodes was evaluated using CT, MRI and palpation. The evaluation of distant metastasis was performed using CT, liver ultrasonography, upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy and bone scintigraphy. Since 2006, PET (positron emission tomography) CT, or PET-MRI has also been used to evaluate the extent of disease. Treatment completion, response and five-year survival rates of each ACRT-treated patient were calculated from medical records, and the results were compared to previously published data.


Of the 25 patients, 24 (96%) underwent all three courses of chemotherapy and scheduled radiation doses; thus, there was a 96% treatment completion rate in our study. One patient refused further treatment after it was determined there was a complete response (CR) after additional radiotherapy. In our study, the most common haematological side effect, at grade 3 toxicity or above, was neutropenia (three patients), and the most common non-haematological symptoms were nausea and mucositis (four patients). The toxicity profile is described in Table II, which was assessed before the third course of chemotherapy using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v. 4.0). Of note, there were no fatal toxicities due to ACRT, corroborating previous work2. Distant metastases were revealed in five patients after ACRT. Of the five patients, one patient died, and four patients survived due to surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy interventions.

Local recurrences were revealed in the nasopharynx of five patients, and of these, four patients died, with one patient surviving following laser resection. Three patients received a neck dissection for cervical lymph node metastasis. In one patient, this metastasis persisted after the conclusion of ACRT, and the patient died of disease at seven months after neck dissection. In one patient, cervical lymph node metastasis was revealed six months after therapy, and the patient died of gastric cancer 24 months later. In the other patient, cervical lymph node metastasis was revealed 14 months after therapy, with the patient surviving for over eight years after receiving surgery for lung, liver and bone metastases. There were no cases requiring reduced dosages of chemotherapy drugs. Additionally, ACRT radiation exposure dynamics did not need to be modified, and percutaneous gastrostomy tubes were not placed before or during ACRT. The total doses of radiotherapy administered to each patient and their outcomes are described in Table III. Although dosage of radiotherapy in our ACRT regimen for nasopharyngeal cancer is lower than that of other chemoradiotherapy regimens, and the only patients who was treated with lower doses of radiotherapy did not tend to experience local recurrence. Thus, in sum, the five-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 70%, and the five-year overall survival rate was 89.3% (Fig. 2).


When an initial diagnosis of nasopharyngeal cancer is made, it typically lacks specific symptoms and is often in an advanced stage. Previous studies have shown that combined chemotherapy is better than radiotherapy alone for treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer 3-7. For example, PFS and overall survival (OS) rates are significantly improved with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) plus adjuvant therapy compared with RT alone. The three-year survival rate for RT patients was 47% compared with a 78% three-year survival rate for CCRT plus adjuvant therapy (P = 0.005), and three-year PFS was 24% versus 69%, respectively (P < 0.001). However, in these studies, the treatment period was longer (130 days), and the treatment completion rate was lower (55%) in patients treated via CCRT combined with adjuvant therapy 2 3. Other combinations of radiotherapy and chemotherapy have been used to treat nasopharyngeal cancer followed by an initial round of radiation. In particular, several methods are used including adjuvant chemotherapy 8 9, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy 10 11, ACRT 1 7 12-14 20 and CCRT 3 5 15-18. It appears that the regimen used is different in each institution, including the administration time of the individual drugs.

In the present study, ACRT was performed with a treatment completion rate of 96% in our department. Previous ACRT treatment completion rates from other institutions were 80%, 70% and 76.1% 13 14 20, and CCRT completion rates were 63% and 66% 3 17. ACRT has been previously reported to result in fewer side effects compared to CCRT 13. Therefore, we administered both a drug and radiation dose in our ACRT regimen that minimised side effects. Compared to the ACRT regimen outlined by Fuwa et al.13, additional radiation was reduced in our study if the patient had a CR after the second course of chemotherapy.

At our institution, the total radiation dose ranged from 54.4 to 70 Gy (average: 60.7 Gy). Although the standard irradiation dose is 66-70 Gy in most regimens 4 14, 60 Gy was chosen for the curative irradiation dose based on previous studies of the synergistic interaction between chemotherapy and radiotherapy 13 21. As a result, the lower dosage of radiotherapy might have contributed to the higher treatment completion rate, and thus to the higher survival rates. Although the dosage of radiotherapy in our ACRT regimen for nasopharyngeal cancer is lower than that of other chemoradiotherapy regimens, the treatment completion rate, response rate and CR rate were all high, and the survival rate might have enough power to allow comparison with other studies.

Nasopharyngeal cancer is most common in East Asia, Japan included, and EBV is mentioned among the risk factors for nasopharyngeal cancer. Although the link between EBV infection and nasopharyngeal cancer is complex and not completely understood, the success of this low dose radiation procedure might have been related to a factor specific to East Asian nasopharyngeal cancer. In addition, to improve ACRT treatment completion rate, the interval between radiation and chemotherapy was maintained in our study in order to control vital signs, symptoms, renal function, bone marrow activity and patient recovery. Similar to an original paper by Fuwa et al. 13, when serum creatinine levels were above 1.5 mg/dL on the scheduled date of chemotherapy, chemotherapy was not performed. In addition, when a WBC count below 3,000/mm2 or platelet count below 75,000/mm2 was obtained, chemotherapy was postponed, and radiotherapy was performed instead. If necessary, at our institution, we waited three weeks to meet the inclusion criteria (WBC count > 3,000/mm2 and platelet count > 75,000/mm2) after the initial round of chemotherapy. We used G-CSF and consulted the internal medicine department to determine the next steps regarding the patient’s administration of subsequent rounds of chemotherapy. Because it is important that all patients complete the third systemic course of chemotherapy, patients who refused this third course had a poor prognosis, as previously noted 14.

In addition, when the WBC and platelet counts were respectively below 1,000/mm2 and 25,000/mm2 after chemotherapy, the dose of 5-FU and CDDP was decreased by 25% at the next administration of chemotherapy. Moreover, when serum creatinine levels temporarily exceeded 1.5 mg/dL, 5-FU and CDDP were decreased by 25%.

As mentioned, the CR rate in our study was 96%. A previous study highlighted an ACRT CR rate of 84% 13, and other studies noted CCRT CR rates of 70% and 93% 16 18. With respect to the antitumour effects, ACRT is inferior to CCRT; however, in general, the CR rate is higher. This highlights the fact that completion of ACRT is extremely important. Moreover, the five-year survival rate was 89.3% in our study. Two previous studies showed that the three-year survival rate at institutions that performed neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was 58% and 59%, respectively 10 11. Additional studies highlighted the following survival rates with respective therapies: adjuvant chemotherapy, 59% (four-year survival rate) 8 and 61% (five-year survival rate) 9; CCRT, 72% and 70.3% (five-year survival rates) 5 19; and ACRT, 78.1%, 83%, and 78.04% (five-year survival rates) 12 13 20.

It has also been reported that a lower CDDP dose is more effective. This is because the treatment completion rate and survival rate over three years using a lower CDDP dose were both higher compared with treatment completion and survival rates using higher CDDP doses 13. The extent to which the CDDP dosage can be reduced is unknown; however, ACRT demonstrates decreased invasiveness as compared with CCRT 13. Moreover, for nasopharyngeal cancer, a wider irradiation field is required during radiotherapy because of its progression pattern, and thus, mucositis is a concerning problem when radiotherapy alone is performed. Considering these characteristics of nasopharyngeal cancer, ACRT may be a useful method for treating nasopharyngeal cancer because a sufficient number of antitumour agents can be administered in combination with radiotherapy. Thus, mucositis can be decreased in the ACRT regimen as compared with CCRT 15.

Prior to ACRT, we explained to patients the potential benefits in an attempt to increase willingness towards treatment and encourage full completion. There are several reports that a majority of individuals are not diagnosed with nasopharyngeal cancer until they are in stage IV 13, and 40% of the cases in our department were also detected at stage IV. This is because nasopharyngeal cancer does not typically present with specific symptoms as stated earlier. However, it can be rapidly diagnosed in departments such as ours if nasal congestion and the ears are affected compared with presentation of symptoms such as headache and eye problems. Additionally, nasopharyngeal cancer is a rare form of head and neck cancer and is therefore not included as a differential diagnosis for many nonspecific symptoms. To address the issues of delayed diagnosis in the future, physicians should consider this type of cancer when patients present with persisting facial symptoms.

It is also important that a multidisciplinary approach (i.e., ACRT) is continuously employed in the treatment of distant metastasis after a neck dissection has been done to control such metastasis. Furthermore, the primary tumour recurrence rate is associated with poor prognosis, and thus, the choice of treatment is restricted due to anatomical reasons 12. Split course radiation has inferior treatment outcomes. However, ACRT is different from split course radiation therapy because of the subsequent course of chemotherapy. In addition, ACRT permits patients to take higher doses of antitumour agents compared with CCRT 14.


In conclusion, we demonstrate that ACRT is an effective regimen to treat nasopharyngeal cancer, revealing higher treatment completion, response and five-year overall survival rates compared with other combinatorial radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatment regimens. Because our results are based on a clinical trial with only 25 patients, further study will be required to draw firm conclusions.

Figures and tables

Fig. 1..

Fig. 2..

Table I..

Patient characteristics Number of patients
Male 19
Female 6
Performance status
0 24
1 1
2 0
II A 2
II B 4
T2aN1:2 T2bN1:2
T2aN2:1; T2bN2:5; T3N0:1; T3N1:1; T3N2:1
IV A 5
T4N0:1 T4N1:3 T4N2:1
IV B 5
T2bN3a:2; T2bN3b:1; T4N3a:2
WHO type I 3
WHO type II 12
WHO type III 10
Postero-superior wall 2
Lateral wall 23
Inferior wall 0
Follow up duration
2-11 months 1
12-59 months 10
60-190 months 14
Characteristics of nasopharyngeal cancer.

Table II..

Toxicity grade (number of patients)
1 2 3 4
White blood cell 8 14 3 0
Neutrophil 9 13 3 0
Platelet 24 1 0 0
Nausea 10 11 4 0
Mucositis 11 10 4 0
Renal dysfunction 23 2 0 0
Adverse effects during ACRT. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v. 4.0).

Table III..

Total doses (Gy) Number of patients Local recurrence Neck metastasis Clinical course
54.4 2 0 0 NED 2/2
56 1 0 0 NED
56.4 4 2 0 NED 1/4 DOD 2/4 DOOD 1
58.2 1 0 0 NED
58.4 1 0 0 NED
59.6 1 0 0 NED
60 2 0 0 NED 2/2
60.4 4 0 1 NED 4/4
61.2 1 1 0 DOD
62.4 1 0 1 DOOD
63 1 0 0 NED
66 1 0 0 Alive wD
66.4 4 2 1 NED 3/4 DOD 1/4
70 1 0 0 NED
Total doses of radiotherapy administered to each patient and their outcomes.