Head and neck
Published: 2018-12-01

prognostic significance of E-cadherin expression in laryngeal squamous-cell carcinoma: a systematic review

ENT Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
ENT Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Italy
Surgical Sciences Department, University of Turin, Italy
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Italy
Laryngeal squamous carcinoma Immunohistochemistry E-cadherin Prognostic factors


The aim of this study was to systematically review publications that investigated the prognostic role of E-cadherin immunostaining in patients
affected by laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. An appropriate string was run on PubMed to retrieve articles dealing with this topic.
A double cross-check was performed on citations and full-text articles by two authors independently to analyse all manuscripts and perform
a comprehensive quality assessment. Among 89 abstracts identified, 13 articles were included. These studies reported on 1,121 patients
with histologically confirmed diagnosis of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Overall, there were 10 studies that showed a significant
correlation between E-cadherin immunohistochemical expression and at least one of the clinical and histopathological parameters considered
by the authors. In particular E-cadherin expression was significantly associated with N stage (five studies), grading (four studies) and
disease-free survival/disease-specific survival (six studies). In conclusion, the findings of our review appear similar to the results published
by other authors on the putative role of E-cadherin in progression of malignancy. In fact, for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma it seems
that lower levels of E-cadherin correlate with increased tumoural aggressiveness and worse prognosis. Nevertheless, further high-quality
prospective studies should be carried out to clarify if E-cadherin expression may be considered as an independent prognostic factor for
patients affected by laryngeal cancer.


Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the sixth most common type of cancer in the world, accounting for more than 540,000 new cases and 271,000 mortalities each year. Laryngeal SCC represents the second most common malignancy of the head and neck region in adults accounting for about 1.5% of all cancers 1.

Known prognostic factors for survival and prognosis in laryngeal SCC are histopathological grading, involved subsite and tumour stage according to the TNM classification. Of these, the TNM system is the most sufficient, but its weakness in terms of prognostic accuracy is well recognised and patients with identical clinicopathologic features can show different clinical course or response to the same therapy 2.

For subjects affected by laryngeal SCC, poor survival can be mainly attributed to the high frequency of local recurrence. In fact, the presence of lymph node metastases represents the most important adverse independent prognostic factor in this malignancy and decreases overall survival by more than 50% if extracapsular expansion exists 3.

On the basis of the primary laryngeal subsite involved, for subjects with a clinically negative neck (cN0) there are two main strategies, which include elective neck dissection and “watchful waiting”. Currently, the National Cancer Comprehensive Network’s practice guidelines recommend to perform elective neck dissection for clinical N0 supraglottic SCC 4. However, personalised management of the cN0 neck, especially in patients with early laryngeal SCC would benefit greatly from staging techniques that increase the accuracy of assessment of nodal disease.

For these reasons, clinical staging should be supplemented by other factors that would increase our knowledge about the biologic behaviour of this tumuor, and biological markers capable of distinguishing patients with good prognosis from those with poor prognosis are thus required 5.

An important step in the process of tumour metastases is the detachment of malignant cells from their original site. In normal epithelial tissues, cell-cell adhesion is mediated by a large number of cell adhesion molecules 6. Cadherins are a family of transmembrane glycoproteins with a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail, which interacts with the cytoskeleton via the intracellular proteins a, b and g catenins. The cadherin family contains several members, depending on their tissue distribution, including E-cadherin, which forms the key functional component of adherens junctions between epithelial cells 7. E-cadherin is involved not only in cell adhesion and morphogenesis, but also in cellular signal transduction. In a variety of epithelial neoplasms, loss or reduction of E-cadherin expression has been associated with advanced stages of tumour growth, increased metastatic potential, shortened disease-free period and lowered overall survival, with a concomitant poor prognosis 8-12.

The aim of our review was to systematically summarise published studies investigating the significance of E-cadherin immunohistochemical (IHC) expression in patients affected by laryngeal SCC.

Materials and methods

Search methods for identification of studies

In September 2017, a computerised MEDLINE search was performed from the start of the database until the end of September 2017 using the PubMed service of the US National Library of Medicine by running the following search string:

(“Cadherins”[Mesh] OR “Cadherin Related Proteins”[Mesh]) AND (“Larynx”[Mesh] OR “Laryngeal Neoplasms”[Mesh])

Reference lists from relevant articles were hand searched for further studies.

The initial search returned a total of 89 results. Abstracts and titles obtained were screened independently by two of the authors (FMG and MR), who subsequently met to discuss disagreements on citation inclusion.

Inclusion criteria for citations were:

  1. cohorts of patients with histological confirmed diagnosis of laryngeal SCC.

Exclusion criteria for citations were:

  1. analysis including samples of patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of laryngeal basaloid SCC;
  2. articles concerning different markers than E-cadherin;
  3. data obtained from in vitro experiments;
  4. languages other than English.

Of the 89 articles, 15 met the initial inclusion criteria according to both authors (FMG and MR). These were obtained and reviewed in detail by the same two authors, who met and discussed disagreements on article inclusion. Inclusion criteria for full text articles and single patients identified were:

  1. sufficient and accurate description of IHC staining;
  2. sufficient and accurate description of statistical analysis.

Exclusion criteria were:

  1. analysis performed on specimens of patients with history of previous head and neck radiotherapy;
  2. analysis including samples of patients affected by SCC of other organs than larynx;
  3. analysis including duplicate data.

A total of three studies were excluded. The first was ruled out because of insufficient data while other two studies were excluded respectively for the presence of duplicate data (one study) and the inclusion of subjects affected by hypopharynx SCC (one study). A further manual check was performed on the references included in the articles and one additional study was identified that met the inclusion criteria. The final number of articles included in the present review was identified, and the main information was extracted and summarised.


After an initial check, full-text retrieval and manual cross-checking of references included in the articles, 13 studies, comprising a total of 1,121 subjects, clearly met the inclusion criteria and were chosen for analysis (Fig. 1).

The main characteristics of the selected studies are summarised in Tables I, II.

All studies had a retrospective cohort design. The average length of follow-up was reported in six studies, with a mean of 40.3 months and ranging from 24 to 60 months.

Overall, the number of patients included in each study varied from 37 to 289.

The vast majority of patients (n = 467) had a glottic cancer, while supraglottic localisation was described in 445 subjects. A transglottic tumour was described in 66 cases and only 31 patients presented with subglottic localisation. Two studies did not report the specific subsite.

Among the analysed articles, 10 reported at least one significant correlation between E-cadherin IHC expression and the clinical or histopathological parameters evaluated. A significant correlation was found for N stage (5/13), grading (4/13), disease-free survival/disease-specific survival (6/13) and overall survival (3/13). Three studies failed to find any significant correlations.


At present, it still appears difficult to forecast the exact prognosis for the clinical course of laryngeal SCC with established clinical parameters such as TNM classification and histopathological grading 2. TNM classification represents the most powerful parameter, but is criticised as an unreliable prognostic indicator for the head and neck region due to unfavourable clinical outcomes, especially for small tumours 13. Moreover, analysing the clinical behaviour of laryngeal SCC, it must always take account of the supraglottis subsite as it has a richer lymphatic supply. That consideration supports the published data showing a higher incidence of lymph node metastases and occult metastases for supraglottic SCC in comparison to glottic SCC 6.

Currently, imaging techniques such as CT, MRI and ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology are employed to assess the status of cervical lymph nodes. However, the limited sensitivity and specificity of CT and MRI in detection of lymph node metastases must be considered. For ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology, although it can detect more than 80% lymph node metastases, there is still a risk of occult metastases 14.

During the last years, many studies were planned with the aim to investigate the role played by different cellular biomarkers, which could help to potentiate our diagnostic and therapeutic capability. Indeed, the number of potentially useful biomarkers is large and many studies have been published on this topic. Therefore, in recent years several reviews were published that summarise the literature on specific cellular biomarkers and tumour progression in head and neck 15-20 and laryngeal SCC 2 5 21-24.

E-cadherin is expressed in the lower spinous and basal cell layer and is involved in the transduction of signals controlling various cellular events, including polarity, differentiation, growth and cell migration. E-cadherin provides intercellular adhesion of cancer cells and its suppression in the primary lesion plays a role as a trigger for liberalisation of cancer cells 25.

Regarding the role of E-cadherin in laryngeal SCC, there are some interesting results that could be extrapolated from the selection of the studies included herein. Akdeniz et al. 26, analysing the IHC expression of E-cadherin in tissue specimens of 38 patients with laryngeal SCC, noted that a lower level of E-cadherin protein expression correlated with poor differentiation of the tumour (p < 0.05) and a major risk of nodal metastases (p = 0.045). Ahmed et al. 27, in their cohort of 75 subjects, found a significant correlation between reduced E-cadherin expression and poor tumour differentiation (p = 0.004), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.006), advanced T-stage (p = 0.001) and TNM stage (p = 0.001). Cappellesso et al. 28, in a cohort of 37 patients, observed a significant correlation (p = 0.04) between lower levels of E-cadherin and shorter disease-free survival (DFS), while there was no relation with nodal stage. Carico et al. 29 analysed a group of 55 patients affected by T1N0 laryngeal SCC. The authors did not find a significant relation between low E-cadherin levels and poorer DFS. However, a significant association was noted between scarce presence of E-cadherin and less differentiated tumour grade (p = 0.006). An interesting study was recently performed by Greco et al. 30 who analysed the relation between E-cadherin expression by IHC and survival rates in a cohort of 82 patients. The authors observed that patients whose tumours overexpressed both cytoplasmic and membranous E-cadherin experienced worse 3-year overall survival (OS). Similarly, patients whose tumours overexpressed cytoplasmic E-cadherin experienced significantly worse 3-year disease specific survival (DSS). These results are surprising because overexpression of E-cadherin should result in the stabilisation of cadherin/catenin complexes. Li et al. 6, analysing the specimens of 64 patients, found that reduced E-cadherin expression was significantly correlated with lymph node metastases (p < 0.001). Moreover, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a significant correlation between E-cadherin expression and patient survival (p < 0.05). Indeed, the high expression group of patients presented higher OS and DFS rates.

Recently, Qian et al. 31, in a cohort of 79 patients, found that a significant correlation (p = 0.028) was present between elevated E-cadherin expression by IHC and higher OS. Analysing the specimens of 95 subjects, Rodrigo et al. 32 noted that decreased E-cadherin expression was correlated with the presence of nodal metastases (p = 0.006). In their cohort of 150 patients (mainly affected by supraglottic SCCs), Zou et al. 33 reported a significant association between E-cadherin immunostaining and T-stage (p = 0.000), cervical lymph node metastasis (p = 0.000) and histological grade (p = 0.048). A tendency for low E-cadherin expression to correlate with tumour recurrence was also found (p = 0.000), but at multivariate logistic regression analysis E-cadherin was not an independent predictor factor of DFS (p = 0.063). Psyrri et al. 34 conducted a study on a larger cohort of 286 patients. On the basis of their analysis, the authors concluded that patients whose tumours overexpressed both cytoplasmic and membranous E-cadherin experienced longer DFS compared to those whose tumours overexpressed only cytoplasmic E-cadherin (p = 0.0106). However, it must be noted that some authors failed to observe a significant relation between E-cadherin IHC expression with oncological features and survival 25 35 36.


On the basis of data collected in our review, the role of E-cadherin in laryngeal SCC progression remains still difficult to elucidate. An important relation seems to exist between reduction of cellular E-cadherin levels and development of nodal metastases with consequent worsening of prognosis. Nevertheless, many inconsistencies were present between the studies analysed, especially regarding the patient populations and IHC scoring system. Thus, in our opinion, new prospective studies with homogeneous cohorts of patients are required to draw definitive conclusions about this topic.

Figures and tables

Fig. 1.Flowchart demonstrating study selection.

Authors Year No. of patients pT stage pN stage Tumour subsites Mean follow-up period (Mo.)
T1 T2 T3 T4 N– N+ Glottic Supraglottic Transglottic Subglottic
Rodrigo et al. 23 2007 95 12 35 36 12 42 53 0 95 0 0 n/a
Zou et al. 33 2010 150 n/a n/a n/a n/a 83 67 122 16 0 12 49
Paksoy et al. 25 2011 56 0 22 24 10 33 23 24 16 14 2 n/a
Li et al. 6 2012 64 8 14 32 10 28 36 36 21 0 7 60
Carico et al. 29 2012 55* 55 0 0 0 55 0 48 7 0 0 36
Akdeniz et al. 26 2013 38 2 16 9 11 23 15 1 22 15 0 n/a
Ahmed et al. 27 2014 75 n/a n/a n/a n/a 51 24 n/a n/a n/a n/a 40
Psyrri et al. 34 2014 289** n/a n/a n/a n/a 243° 45° 125 135 23 6 n/a
Greco et al. 30 2015 82 n/a n/a n/a n/a 48 34 47 26 9 0 33
Ali Bayram et al. 35 2015 60 0 8 36 16 30 30 0 60 0 0 n/a
Cappellesso et al. 28 2015 37 1 8 23 5 16 21 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Barutçu et al. 36 2016 41 14 22 5 0 34 7 25 16 0 0 24
Qian et al. 31 2016 79 n/a n/a n/a n/a 53 26 39 31 5 4 n/a
Table I.Main characteristics of the studies analysed with correlations between clinical-histopathological parameters and expression.
Authors E-cadherin assay E-cadherin location Cutoff level Clinical and histopathological investigated parameters
T N Stage Grade DFS/DSS OS
Rodrigoet al. 23 IHC C-M Score No Yes N/E No No N/E
Zou et al. 33 IHC C Score Yes Yes N/E Yes Yes N/E
Paksoy et al. 25 IHC n/a > 75% N/E No N/E N/E N/E N/E
Li et al. 6 IHC C-M Score N/E Yes N/E N/E Yes Yes
Carico et al. 29 IHC M Score N/E N/E N/E Yes No N/E
Akdeniz et al. 26 IHC C-M Score N/E Yes No Yes N/E N/E
Ahmed et al. 27 IHC C-M > 50% N/E Yes Yes Yes Yes N/E
Psyrri et al. 34 IHC C-M Score No No No No Yes No
Greco et al. 30 IHC C-M > 50% N/E N/E N/E N/E Yes Yes
Ali Bayram et al. 35 IHC n/a > 25% No No No No N/E N/E
Cappellesso et al. 28 IHC M Score N/E No N/E N/E Yes N/E
Barutçu et al. 36 IHC n/a > 50% No No No No No No
Qian et al. 31 IHC C-M > 20% No No No No N/E Yes
Table II.E-cadherin thresholds of positivity and correlations with clinical-histopathological parameters.


  1. Re M, Çeka A, Rubini C. MicroRNA-34c-5p is related to recurrence in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.. Laryngoscope. 2015; 125:E306-12.
  2. Gioacchini FM, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Magliulo G. The clinical relevance of Ki-67 expression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 272:1569-76.
  3. Johnson JT, Myers EN. Laryngeal cancer.. Thieme Medical Publishers: New York; 1991.
  4. Liao LJ, Hsu WL, Wang CT. Analysis of sentinel node biopsy combined with other diagnostic tools in staging cN0 head and neck cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis.. Head Neck. 2016; 38:628-34.
  5. Gioacchini FM, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Rubini C. Prognostic value of Bcl-2 expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx: a systematic review.. Int J Biol Markers. 2015; 30:e155-60.
  6. Li JJ, Zhang GH, Yang XM. Reduced E-cadherin expression is associated with lymph node metastases in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2012; 39:186-92.
  7. Wijnhoven BPL, Dinjens WNM, Pignatelli M.. E-cadherin-catenin cell-cell adhesion complex and human cancer.. Br J Surg. 2000; 87:992-1005.
  8. Kashibuchi K, Tomita K, Schalken JA. The prognostic value of E-cadherin, alpha-, beta-, and gamma-catenin in urothelial cancer of the upper urinary tract.. Eur Urol. 2006; 49:839-45.
  9. Mikami T, Saegusa M, Mitomi H. Significant correlations of E-cadherin, catenin, and CD44 variant form expression with carcinoma cell differentiation and prognosis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinomas.. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001; 116:369-76.
  10. Kawano T, Nakamura Y, Yanoma S. Expression of E-cadherin, and CD44s and CD44v6 and its association with prognosis in head and neck cancer.. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2004; 31:35-41.
  11. Diniz-Freitas M, Garcia-Caballero T, Antunez-Lopez J. Reduced E-cadherin expression is an indicator of unfavourable prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma.. Oral Oncol. 2006; 42:190-200.
  12. Gould Rothberg BE, Bracken MB. E-cadherin immunohistochemical expression as a prognostic factor in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006; 100:139-48.
  13. Janot F, Klijanienko J, Russo A. Prognostic value of clinicopathological parameters in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective analysis.. Br J Cancer. 1996; 73:531-8.
  14. Van Den Brekel MWM, Castelijns JA, Snow GB. Diagnostic evaluation of the neck.. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1998; 31:601-20.
  15. Gioacchini FM, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Kaleci S. The prognostic value of cyclin D1 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 273:801-9.
  16. Chen J, Zhou J, Lu J. Significance of CD44 expression in head and neck cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14:15.
  17. Rainsbury JW, Ahmed W, Williams HK. Prognostic biomarkers of survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.. Head Neck. 2013; 35:1048-55.
  18. Tandon S, Tudur-Smith C, Riley RD. A systematic review of p53 as a prognostic factor of survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the four main anatomical subsites of the head and neck.. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19:574-87.
  19. Almangush A, Heikkinen I, Mäkitie AA. Prognostic biomarkers for oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Br J Cancer. 2017; 117:856-66.
  20. Guerra EN, Acevedo AC, Leite AF. Diagnostic capability of salivary biomarkers in the assessment of head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Oral Oncol. 2015; 51:805-18.
  21. Yu X, Li Z.. The role of microRNAs expression in laryngeal cancer.. Oncotarget. 2015; 6:23297-305.
  22. Lionello M, Staffieri A, Marioni G.. Potential prognostic and therapeutic role for angiogenesis markers in laryngeal carcinoma.. Acta Otolaryngol. 2012; 132:574-82.
  23. Rodrigo JP, García-Pedrero JM, Suárez C. Biomarkers predicting malignant progression of laryngeal epithelial precursor lesions: a systematic review.. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012; 269:1073-83.
  24. Mesolella M, Iorio B, Landi M. Overexpression of chromatin assembly factor-1/p60 predicts biological behaviour of laryngeal carcinomas.. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2017; 37:17-24.
  25. Paksoy M, Hardal U, Caglar C.. Expression of cathepsin D and E-cadherin in primary laryngeal cancers correlation with neck lymph node involvement.. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011; 137:1371-7.
  26. Akdeniz O, Akduman D, Haksever M. Relationships between clinical behavior of laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas and expression of VEGF, MMP-9 and E-cadherin.. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013; 14:5301-10.
  27. Ahmed RA, Shawky Ael-A, Hamed RH. Prognostic significance of cyclin D1 and E-cadherin expression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.. Pathol Oncol Res. 2014; 20:625-33.
  28. Cappellesso R, Marioni G, Crescenzi M. The prognostic role of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers E-cadherin and slug in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.. Histopathology. 2015; 67:491-500.
  29. Carico E, Radici M, Losito NS. Expression of E-cadherin and α-catenin in T1 N0 laryngeal cancer.. Anticancer Res. 2012; 32:5245-9.
  30. Greco A, De Virgilio A, Rizzo MI. The prognostic role of E-cadherin and β-catenin overexpression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.. Laryngoscope. 2016; 126:E148-55.
  31. Qian X, Ma X, Zhou H. Expression and prognostic value of E-cadherin in laryngeal cancer.. Acta Otolaryngol. 2016; 136:722-8.
  32. Rodrigo JP, Dominguez F, Suárez V. Focal adhesion kinase and E-cadherin as markers for nodal metastasis in laryngeal cancer.. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 133:145-50.
  33. Zou J, Yang H, Chen F. Prognostic significance of fascin-1 and E-cadherin expression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010; 19:11-7.
  34. Psyrri A, Kotoula V, Fountzilas E. Prognostic significance of the Wnt pathway in squamous cell laryngeal cancer.. Oral Oncol. 2014; 50:298-305.
  35. Ali Bayram, Yüce İ, Çağlı S. Predictive value of E-cadherin and Ep-CAM in cervical lymph node metastasis of supraglottic larynx carcinoma.. Am J Otolaryngol. 2015; 36:736-40.
  36. Barutçu O, Kara M, Muratlı A. Clinical significance of Ki-67, c-erbB-2 and E-cadherin expressions in open partial laryngectomy patients.. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2016; 26:283-92.



ENT Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy


ENT Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy


Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Italy


Surgical Sciences Department, University of Turin, Italy


Department of Otorhinolaryngology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy


Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Italy


© Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e chirurgia cervico facciale , 2018

  • Abstract viewed - 1720 times
  • PDF downloaded - 635 times